This is the mail archive of the guile@cygnus.com mailing list for the guile project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Hello: some time ago there was a discussion about implementation of rationals in guile. So far as I understood, there was not much interest in this topic here. Nevertheless, I think, it is important to have support for rationals in some future (in particular, I'd like to have rationals in guile; but I'm not sure that I'll have time to work on their implementation in the nearest time). Does implementation of rationals (in accordance with r4rs or r5rs) necessarily mean that there must be a special tag for them in SCM (and other low-level changes in representation)? If yes, then, I think, it is extremely desirable to foreseen all the necessary changes now, before the whole structure of scheme data types is finaly established. -- Best regards, V.Kamyshenko.