This is the mail archive of the guile@cygnus.com mailing list for the guile project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
On 26 Oct 1998, Harvey J. Stein wrote: > STk's hash tables are faster than Guile's (on the order of 20% faster > when computing runtime-overhead, and on the order of 50% when doing > runtime-gc-overhead, assuming (gc-run-time) returns time in > milliseconds). > my hash tables are a good deal faster than Guile's: the heart of the test (run ten times): ;; <hash table is created> (for-each (insert-entry mytab insert-proc) lines) (for-each (find-entry mytab find-proc) lines) (for-each (insert-entry mytab insert-proc) lines) (for-each (find-entry mytab find-proc) lines) ... for x in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20; do head -n "${x}0000" rand-nos.bak | tail -n 10000 > rand-nos echo "hashtab" ./myguile -s httest.scm echo echo "Guile hash" ./myguile -s gtest.scm 8219 echo done hashtab *time: 539* Guile hash *time: 810* hashtab *time: 517* Guile hash *time: 808* hashtab *time: 549* Guile hash *time: 809* hashtab *time: 554* Guile hash *time: 808* hashtab *time: 537* Guile hash *time: 810* hashtab *time: 535* Guile hash *time: 809* etc.