This is the mail archive of the guile@cygnus.com mailing list for the guile project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Telford Tendys writes: > > > I agree on the need for an encapsulation mechanism to separate > > impementations from interfaces. I think Scheme's austere syntax is a > > hurdle for programmers who Want to Do the Right Thing. > > The one thing that most gets to me when writing scheme code is that > C allows you to return from a function from anywhere you like and scheme > requires that you structure it with (cond) and such. I find commands > like `break', `continue' and `return' incredibly useful (is this just > me?) > > - Tel > R4RS Scheme has call-with-current-continuation, which is much more flexible than the jump instructions of imperative languages, at least is capable to emulate them. Klaus Schilling