This is the mail archive of the gsl-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the GSL project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [row/column majority] gslclapack

From: linas at austin dot ibm dot com (Linas Vepstas)
To: James Bergstra <james dot bergstra at umontreal dot ca>
Cc: gsl-discuss <gsl-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:10:16 -0600
Subject: Re: [row/column majority] gslclapack
References: <20060330164441.17907.qmail@web33810.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603301209340.3253@lilith.rgb.private.net> <20060330222425.GD5115@aphex.iro.umontreal.ca> <20060331000909.GT2172@austin.ibm.com> <20060331174514.GC10496@aphex.iro.umontreal.ca>

On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 12:45:14PM -0500, James Bergstra wrote:
> 
> This answer doesn't make sense to me, because in my example the memory access
> patterns are identical.  


If the memory access patterns are identical, then I guess I don't get
the point?  

--linas

References:
- Re: [row/column majority] gslclapack
  - From: Z F
- Re: [row/column majority] gslclapack
  - From: Robert G. Brown
- Re: [row/column majority] gslclapack
  - From: James Bergstra
- Re: [row/column majority] gslclapack
  - From: Linas Vepstas
- Re: [row/column majority] gslclapack
  - From: James Bergstra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]