This is the mail archive of the
gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GSL project.
Re: new release candidate (gsl-1.5.90)
- From: Brian Gough <bjg at network-theory dot co dot uk>
- To: Giulio Bottazzi <giulio dot bottazzi at libero dot it>
- Cc: gsl-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:45:47 +0000
- Subject: Re: new release candidate (gsl-1.5.90)
- References: <E1Cji3x-0008FV-00@localhost><Pine.LNX.4.50.0412291331150.29540-100000@grus.astro.umd.edu><16852.16896.863758.963158@network-theory.co.uk><20041231012413.4f080104.giulio.bottazzi@libero.it><16853.23210.503801.259972@network-theory.co.uk><20041231164859.59ad9443.giulio.bottazzi@libero.it>
- Reply-to: gsl-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Giulio Bottazzi writes:
> Indeed it works with extended and double precision, while with
> GSL_IEEE_MODE="single-precision,mask-all" make check I obtain (with
> the 1.5 stable version too) FAIL: gsl_fdiv(2,3)
> (0.666666686534881592 observed vs 0.66666666666666663 expected)
> FAIL: test Is this as expected?
Yes, the tests will fail in single-precision. Double-precision or
extended is assumed.
--
Brian Gough