This is the mail archive of the gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GSL project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Here are the test cases. They should excercise all portions of the code. I had to redo the log ones -- thus the delay in my reply. I am not familiar with the test suite so I have just included the cases in plain text. Andrew On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Brian Gough wrote: > Brian Gough writes: > > > I've done as requested. I decided not to use exact same format as > > > specfunc/error.h so the returned result is always similar to that of the > > > original functions. Attached are complex\math.c (with some #ifndef > > > additions) and complex\math_eh.c. Please let me know if you have any > > > other requests. > > Hello, > > Could you write some test cases to exercise the new parts of the code. > The existing test suite (test.c) doesn't cause any floating-point > overflows or underflows in the new functions. > > I made the file into a drop-in replacement for math.c: > http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gsl/dev/math_eh.c > > Here is the output of coverage testing with gcov for 'make check': > http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gsl/dev/math_eh.c.gcov > > -- > Brian Gough > >
Attachment:
allcases.txt
Description: Cases for testing complex elementary function with eh
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |