This is the mail archive of the gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GSL project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [smartquant] Re: GPL license violation? [GNU Scientific Library]


Robert Tisdale wrote:
>You can't copyright an API.
Of course, and once you reimplement GSL then you can say that the software 
does not depend on GSL for its functioning. But until you do, if you 
distribute software and say "this will only work with GSL because no other 
implementation of that API exists" then you have a derivative work.
         quoted from the list archives -- original message by Mark Galassi

 > Show us where you think your assertion
 > has been made clear by the FSF.
Don't you think the message "Can Technical Tricks Circumvent the GPL?" by 
RMS is clear enough?
If your software *depends* on GPL software it must be GPL. Technical tricks 
to circumvent this dependency are just that: technical tricks.

Ferdinando Ametrano


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]