This is the mail archive of the gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GSL project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: ltconfig in distribution

To: gsl-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Subject: Re: ltconfig in distribution
From: gsl-discuss at lists dot thewrittenword dot com
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 02:13:04 -0500
References: <20010905190359.A19922@oolong.il.thewrittenword.com> <15255.48822.975570.945836@debian>
Reply-To: gsl-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com

On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 07:21:42PM +0100, Brian Gough wrote:
> gsl-discuss@lists.thewrittenword.com writes:
>  > ltconfig should not be part of the distribution tarball. It matters
>  > only for libtool 1.3.5 and lower. Also, libtool 1.4.1 just came out
>  > (with some important fixes for AIX). Would be nice for you to upgrade :)
> 
> Ok. I'll use that for future releases. 
> 
> Does ltconfig cause any harm or is it just redundant?  If it doesn't
> cause any errors I'll leave it in until I upgrade automake.

It does no harm. It doesn't get used anywhere.

-- 
albert chin (china@thewrittenword.com)

References:
- ltconfig in distribution
  - From: gsl-discuss
- Re: ltconfig in distribution
  - From: Brian Gough

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]