This is the mail archive of the
glibc-linux@ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: make problems with glibc-2.1
- To: glibc-linux at ricardo dot ecn dot wfu dot edu
- Subject: Re: make problems with glibc-2.1
- From: Rishi R Kumar <rrk+ at andrew dot cmu dot edu>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:56:14 -0500 (EST)
- Reply-To: glibc-linux at ricardo dot ecn dot wfu dot edu
Hello all-
Thanks for the reply, Ravi.
I had already checked the README which just says that any version of
binutils after 2.9.1.x would work. My solution is a bit of a hack-
change where the linker looks for elf32arm to armelf_linux etc. For
this, I need to know where the linker looks for this emulation mode.
Anyone know in what file this is found? Is my solution a viable one,
provided I find the right source code? thanks again-
-rishi
Excerpts from mail: 12-Jan-100 Re: make problems with glib.. by M. Ravi
P. Reddy@yahoo.c
> go through the README file , u
> can find the version of the binutils that
> supports the glibc 2.1 .
>
> mrpr
> --- Rishi R Kumar <rrk+@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
> > hello-
> >
> > When I try and make glibc, I get the following
> > error message:
> >
> > /usr/local/arm/arm-linux/bin/ld: unrecognized
> > emulation mode: elf32arm
> > Supported emulations: armelf_linux
> > armelf_linux26 armelf
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > ...
> >
> > My suspicion is that glibc 2.1 is not supported
> > by the version of
> > binutils that I'm using: 2.9.5.0.21. Here are my
> > questions. Please
> > answer as many as possible:
> >
> > 1) Is my suspicion correct?
> > 2) In which Makefile and where is ld looking for
> > elf32arm (I couldn't
> > seem to find it)
> > 3) Would using a later version of glibc solve this
> > problem?
> >
> > thanks in advance for your time.