This is the mail archive of the
glibc-linux@ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu
mailing list for the glibc project.
Odp: Odp: LD & GLIBC 2.1.2
- To: <glibc-linux at ricardo dot ecn dot wfu dot edu>
- Subject: Odp: Odp: LD & GLIBC 2.1.2
- From: "Subscriber" <linux at mediacom dot pl>
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 01:52:01 +0200
- Cc: <aj at suse dot de>
- Reply-To: glibc-linux at ricardo dot ecn dot wfu dot edu
Thanks. Now I suppose there is OK. Page http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/libc.html should be upgraded (info about add-on packages).
Tom
-----Wiadomość oryginalna-----
Od: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
Do: Subscriber <linux@mediacom.pl>
DW: glibc-linux@ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu <glibc-linux@ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu>
Data: 18 października 1999 12:00
Temat: Re: Odp: LD & GLIBC 2.1.2
>>>>>> Subscriber writes:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > Thanks ;-) `make clean` doesn't work correctly (i think so) - after
> > this there was the same error (in `make`). Just after `rm` other
> > error appeared. There was lack of header (libc-lock.h). I did make
> > glibc with Linux 2.0 and I have used Linux 2.2.12 headers (as I
> > read in INSTALL), but there isn't libc-lock.h. I have found this in
> > linuxthreads (from previous version of libc). Next trial of `make`
> > was finished succesfully, but I am not sure what about working my
> > new glibc (I didn't try yet). What do you think?
>
> > Regards,
>
> > Tom
>
>A number of comments:
>- get crypt-2.1.0 from ftp.gwdg.de (see FAQ for exact location) and
> don't use crypt-2.0.6.
>- make clean doesn't work - see our bug database for details
>- if you got the problem other than with running make clean, I would
> be really interested how you did it.
>- always run make check before installing
>
>Andreas
>--
> Andreas Jaeger
> SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
> private aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de