This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug libc/22440] New: `__utmp_equal` ignores `ut_line` when system has `ut_id`
- From: "fweimer at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 14:22:04 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libc/22440] New: `__utmp_equal` ignores `ut_line` when system has `ut_id`
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22440
Bug ID: 22440
Summary: `__utmp_equal` ignores `ut_line` when system has
`ut_id`
Product: glibc
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libc
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: robertabcd at gmail dot com
CC: drepper.fsp at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Flags: security-
In sysdeps/generic/utmp-equal.h:44:
#if _HAVE_UT_ID - 0
(entry->ut_id[0] && match->ut_id[0]
? strncmp (entry->ut_id, match->ut_id, sizeof match->ut_id) == 0
: strncmp (entry->ut_line, match->ut_line, sizeof match->ut_line) == 0)
#else
strncmp (entry->ut_line, match->ut_line, sizeof match->ut_line) == 0
#endif
);
If the system has `ut_id` and they are set on both side, it won't compare
`ut_line`. Common software like openssh fills `ut_id` with last 4 bytes of
terminal name (e.g. "pts/1000"). As only the last four bytes are used, the
whole file can only hold around ~10k entries before `ut_id` collides.
I propose to make it compare both `ut_id` and `ut_line`, when available. Let me
know what you think. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.