[Bug libc/22144] New: libc.so.6: ELF file OS ABI invalid

["bastl at eclipso dot de" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22144

            Bug ID: 22144
           Summary: libc.so.6: ELF file OS ABI invalid
           Product: glibc
           Version: 2.26
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: libc
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: bastl at eclipso dot de
                CC: drepper.fsp at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

I compiled ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/glibc/glibc-2.26.tar.xz
with:
-linux-4.9.38
-gcc (GCC) 6.3.0
-GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.28
-GNU Awk 4.1.4
-perl 5, version 24, subversion 0 (v5.24.0)
-GNU Make 4.2.1
-libtool (GNU libtool) 2.4.6

for:
-i686-pc-linux-gnu

If I want to use the new glibc I get this error, too:

chroot /mnt/hdb5/SYS-2/
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: get-dynamic-info.h: 143: elf_get_dynamic_info:
Assertion `info[DT_RPATH] == NULL' failed!

bash-4.4# readelf -h ./ld-2.26.so
ELF Header:
  Magic:   7f 45 4c 46 01 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  Class:                             ELF32
  Data:                              2's complement, little endian
  Version:                           1 (current)
  OS/ABI:                            UNIX - System V
  ABI Version:                       0
  Type:                              DYN (Shared object file)
  Machine:                           Intel 80386
  Version:                           0x1
  Entry point address:               0xb50
  Start of program headers:          52 (bytes into file)
  Start of section headers:          1175960 (bytes into file)
  Flags:                             0x0
  Size of this header:               52 (bytes)
  Size of program headers:           32 (bytes)
  Number of program headers:         6
  Size of section headers:           40 (bytes)
  Number of section headers:         32
  Section header string table index: 29

I guess that 80% of all plans compiling glibc from source is to upgrade from a
8-12 years old system to a newest one. So this should be the default initial
position for developing glibc, binutils, ...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.