This is the mail archive of the glibc-bugs@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug stdio/17829] Incorrect handling of precision specifier in printf family


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17829

--- Comment #12 from Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #11)
> (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #10)
> > See bug 14771 comment 4.
> 
> This is a different issue. I'm not talking about the size argument, but the
> 'n' format specifier.

They are related.  I'm not sure if it is reasonable to expect that if snprintf
fails with EOVERFLOW, %n output has been written.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]