This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug localedata/20664] Unexpected collation in en_US.UTF-8, different to ICU CLDR
- From: "carlos at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 23:10:56 +0000
- Subject: [Bug localedata/20664] Unexpected collation in en_US.UTF-8, different to ICU CLDR
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-20664-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20664
Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2016-10-03
CC| |carlos at redhat dot com
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> ---
Going forward we want glibc to track CLDR more closely. Therefore if you can
find a glibc version that exhibits meaningful difference between CLDR, then
please file a report, like this one.
However, you have too many moving pieces for us to validate this, for example
sort is not a good test case because it might itself not use glibc's collation
tables for sorting.
Can you construct a test case with strcoll that exhibits this problem?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.