This is the mail archive of the glibc-bugs@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug nptl/11588] pthread condvars are not priority inheritance aware


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11588

--- Comment #54 from Torvald Riegel <triegel at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Darren Hart from comment #52)
> Torvald, can you provide a specific citation, preferably to the accessible
> SUS. I'm looking to see if I have access to POSIX. I'd like to read the
> specific requirement regarding stronger ordering of waiters vs signals.

http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=609
(probably best to read from comment 1403 downwards).  I think the C++
specification for condvars is the cleanest one (see N4567, paragraph 30.5p3-4).
 AFAIU, POSIX and ISO C have the same semantics in mind.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]