This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug dynamic-link/17711] copy relocations against protected symbols don't work
- From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:28:12 +0000
- Subject: [Bug dynamic-link/17711] copy relocations against protected symbols don't work
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-17711-131 at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17711
--- Comment #27 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU C Library master sources".
The branch, hjl/pr17711/2.18 has been created
at 3350e1867c0b82957093fa9e1c52a5f841881377 (commit)
- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=3350e1867c0b82957093fa9e1c52a5f841881377
commit 3350e1867c0b82957093fa9e1c52a5f841881377
Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Mar 6 04:55:56 2015 -0800
Replace __attribute__((visibility("protected")))
With copy relocation, address of protected data defined in the shared
library may be external. Compiler shouldn't asssume protected data will
be local. But due to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248
__attribute__((visibility("protected"))) doesn't work correctly, we need
to use asm (".protected xxx") instead.
Cherry-pick from master: e0ed2fb40a0e29c43cf60addc74741dab15f2e05
* elf/ifuncdep2.c (global): Replace
__attribute__((visibility("protected"))) with
asm (".protected global").
* elf/ifuncmod1.c (global): Likewise.
* elf/ifuncmod5.c (global): Likewise.
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=a0f66d616575074b0f569da3f561fa0fe09fa312
commit a0f66d616575074b0f569da3f561fa0fe09fa312
Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Thu Mar 5 11:36:35 2015 -0800
Add a testcase for copy reloc against protected data
Linkers in some versions of binutils 2.25 and 2.26 don't support protected
data symbol with error messsage like:
/usr/bin/ld: copy reloc against protected `bar' is invalid
/usr/bin/ld: failed to set dynamic section sizes: Bad value
We check if linker supports copy reloc against protected data symbol to
avoid running the test if linker is broken.
Cherry-pick from master: 83569fb894050db7430047da2219ca50c68f882a
[BZ #17711]
* config.make.in (have-protected-data): New.
* configure.ac: Check linker support for protected data symbol.
* configure: Regenerated.
* elf/Makefile (modules-names): Add tst-protected1moda and
tst-protected1modb if $(have-protected-data) is yes.
(tests): Add tst-protected1a and tst-protected1b if
$(have-protected-data) is yes.
($(objpfx)tst-protected1a): New.
($(objpfx)tst-protected1b): Likewise.
(tst-protected1modb.so-no-z-defs): Likewise.
* elf/tst-protected1a.c: New file.
* elf/tst-protected1b.c: Likewise.
* elf/tst-protected1mod.h: Likewise.
* elf/tst-protected1moda.c: Likewise.
* elf/tst-protected1modb.c: Likewise.
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=79bb575bc9160f0be7c6770de56e9240fada34c0
commit 79bb575bc9160f0be7c6770de56e9240fada34c0
Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Mar 31 05:15:43 2015 -0700
Add ELF_RTYPE_CLASS_EXTERN_PROTECTED_DATA to x86
With copy relocation, address of protected data defined in the shared
library may be external. When there is a relocation against the
protected data symbol within the shared library, we need to check if we
should skip the definition in the executable copied from the protected
data. This patch adds ELF_RTYPE_CLASS_EXTERN_PROTECTED_DATA and defines
it for x86. If ELF_RTYPE_CLASS_EXTERN_PROTECTED_DATA isn't 0, do_lookup_x
will skip the data definition in the executable from copy reloc.
Cherry-pick from master: 62da1e3b00b51383ffa7efc89d8addda0502e107
[BZ #17711]
* elf/dl-lookup.c (do_lookup_x): When UNDEF_MAP is NULL, which
indicates it is called from do_lookup_x on relocation against
protected data, skip the data definion in the executable from
copy reloc.
(_dl_lookup_symbol_x): Pass ELF_RTYPE_CLASS_EXTERN_PROTECTED_DATA,
instead of ELF_RTYPE_CLASS_PLT, to do_lookup_x for
EXTERN_PROTECTED_DATA relocation against STT_OBJECT symbol.
* sysdeps/generic/ldsodefs.h * (ELF_RTYPE_CLASS_EXTERN_PROTECTED_DATA):
New. Defined to 4 if DL_EXTERN_PROTECTED_DATA is defined,
otherwise to 0.
* sysdeps/i386/dl-lookupcfg.h (DL_EXTERN_PROTECTED_DATA): New.
* sysdeps/i386/dl-machine.h (elf_machine_type_class): Set class
to ELF_RTYPE_CLASS_EXTERN_PROTECTED_DATA for R_386_GLOB_DAT.
* sysdeps/x86_64/dl-lookupcfg.h (DL_EXTERN_PROTECTED_DATA): New.
* sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h (elf_machine_type_class): Set class
to ELF_RTYPE_CLASS_EXTERN_PROTECTED_DATA for R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.