This is the mail archive of the glibc-bugs@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug libc/17662] please implement binding for the new renameat2 syscall


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17662

--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> ---
Please use libc-alpha, not Bugzilla, to propose new APIs; Bugzilla is for 
objective bugs, not subjective questions about the desirability of 
features.  There is no consensus on when Linux-specific interfaces should 
have bindings in glibc; you need to join the thread starting at 
<https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-10/msg00541.html> and help the 
community reach a consensus (and then maybe help with the analysis to 
determine what syscalls merit bindings according to that consensus, and 
with the implementation of those bindings).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]