This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug libc/12515] clock() should provide better precision
- From: "vincent-srcware at vinc17 dot net" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:05:21 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libc/12515] clock() should provide better precision
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-12515-131 at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12515
Vincent LefÃvre <vincent-srcware at vinc17 dot net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |vincent-srcware at vinc17 dot net
--- Comment #15 from Vincent LefÃvre <vincent-srcware at vinc17 dot net> ---
I disagree with the reason of the change. This is all about precision vs
accuracy. But this is more a documentation issue. I've reported a new bug about
the documentation:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17383
(this is against the manual, the IMHO, the code itself should be better
documented).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.