This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug localedata/12349] Incorrect thousands separator and first weekday for eu_ES locale
- From: "keld at keldix dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 16:07:44 +0000
- Subject: [Bug localedata/12349] Incorrect thousands separator and first weekday for eu_ES locale
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-12349-131 at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12349
--- Comment #7 from keld at keldix dot com <keld at keldix dot com> ---
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 03:33:47PM +0000, carlos at redhat dot com wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12349
>
> Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |carlos at redhat dot com
>
> --- Comment #6 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> ---
> (In reply to Julen Ruiz Aizpuru from comment #5)
> > I would expect Unicode CLDR to be a valid reference. There you go:
> > http://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/25/by_type/numbers.symbols.
> > html#Symbols_when_using_Western_Digits_%28latn%29
>
> Agreed, CLDR is a valid reference. In fact I think we should be copying exactly
> what they do (and we are in other bugs). Since they have far more language
> experts than we do working on the problem.
Well, I do think we have many more language experts than CLDR.
CLDR is a small group of people, where we have hundreds of experts
in libc-locale. I know for my language Danish that the CLDR data has been
erroneous, and I tried to correct it to no avail at that time.
So I gave up and I do not give too much for their info.
Best regards
Keld
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.