This is the mail archive of the glibc-bugs@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug libc/9712] Expose futex system call


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9712

Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
                 CC|                            |bugdal at aerifal dot cx
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |---

--- Comment #2 from Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> ---
Can we please revisit the question of exposing a public futex function and
assocated macros? Using syscall.h from applications is a horrible hack. Now
that C11 has atomics, the demand for working directly with atomics is likely to
increase, but for lots of applications of atomics you also need futex().

If this is acceptable, my preferred header for the interface would be
sys/futex.h.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]