This is the mail archive of the glibc-bugs@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug libc/6981] __STDC_IEC_559__ should not be defined unconditionally


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6981

--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> ---
There would be no reason for F.6 and F.10.11 (in C11) if the intent wasn't 
to support evaluation in wider types.  DTS 18661-1 clarifies things 
further and provides the previously missing bindings to operations without 
wide evaluation (e.g. the new functions fadd and faddl (formatOf addition 
of double / long double, rounding once to float) both serve also to 
provide bindings for addition of two floats, returning a float without 
excess range or precision, even if straight "+" operates in the range and 
precision of long double).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]