This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug ports/15632] New: MIPS sqrt implementations not being used
- From: "jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:05:57 +0000
- Subject: [Bug ports/15632] New: MIPS sqrt implementations not being used
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15632
Bug ID: 15632
Summary: MIPS sqrt implementations not being used
Product: glibc
Version: 2.17
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ports
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: carlos at redhat dot com, roland at gnu dot org
Host: mips*-linux*
The sysdeps directory ordering for mips*-linux* is such that the MIPS sqrt
implementations in ports/sysdeps/mips/fpu/ don't get used because the flt-32
and dbl-64 directories come first. For n32 I see:
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/n32/nptl
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/n32
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/nptl
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/nptl ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips
nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux nptl/sysdeps/pthread sysdeps/pthread
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux sysdeps/gnu
sysdeps/unix/inet nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv
sysdeps/unix/sysv ports/sysdeps/unix/mips/mips64/n32
ports/sysdeps/unix/mips/mips64 ports/sysdeps/unix/mips nptl/sysdeps/unix
ports/sysdeps/unix sysdeps/unix sysdeps/posix ports/sysdeps/mips/mips64/n32
ports/sysdeps/mips/ieee754 sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128
ports/sysdeps/mips/mips64/soft-fp ports/sysdeps/mips/mips64
sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32 sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64 ports/sysdeps/mips
sysdeps/wordsize-32 ports/sysdeps/mips/fpu ports/sysdeps/mips/nptl
sysdeps/ieee754 sysdeps/generic
For o32 I see:
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips32/nptl
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips32
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/nptl ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips
nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux nptl/sysdeps/pthread sysdeps/pthread
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux sysdeps/gnu
sysdeps/unix/inet nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv
sysdeps/unix/sysv ports/sysdeps/unix/mips/mips32 ports/sysdeps/unix/mips
nptl/sysdeps/unix ports/sysdeps/unix sysdeps/unix sysdeps/posix
ports/sysdeps/mips/mips32/fpu ports/sysdeps/mips/mips32
ports/sysdeps/mips/ieee754 ports/sysdeps/mips sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32
sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64 sysdeps/wordsize-32 ports/sysdeps/mips/fpu
ports/sysdeps/mips/nptl sysdeps/ieee754 sysdeps/generic
For n64 I see:
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/n64/nptl
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/n64
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/nptl
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/nptl ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips
nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux nptl/sysdeps/pthread sysdeps/pthread
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux sysdeps/gnu
sysdeps/unix/inet nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv
sysdeps/unix/sysv ports/sysdeps/unix/mips/mips64/n64
ports/sysdeps/unix/mips/mips64 ports/sysdeps/unix/mips nptl/sysdeps/unix
ports/sysdeps/unix sysdeps/unix sysdeps/posix ports/sysdeps/mips/mips64/n64
ports/sysdeps/mips/ieee754 sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128
ports/sysdeps/mips/mips64/soft-fp ports/sysdeps/mips/mips64
sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32 sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64 ports/sysdeps/mips
sysdeps/wordsize-64 ports/sysdeps/mips/fpu ports/sysdeps/mips/nptl
sysdeps/ieee754 sysdeps/generic
The simple fix probably is wrapping these files in more specific directories
such as mips/mips32/fpu that come early enough in the sysdeps ordering; I don't
know if there's a better approach.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.