This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug libc/12515] clock() should provide better precision
- From: "bugdal at aerifal dot cx" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 02:58:20 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libc/12515] clock() should provide better precision
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-12515-131 at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12515
Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|2011-02-24 12:58:42 |2013-04-19
CC| |bugdal at aerifal dot cx
Resolution|INVALID |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #7 from Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> 2013-04-19 02:58:20 UTC ---
I think this bug should be revisited. As far as I can tell, the
CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID clock is a valid implementation of clock(), and unlike
the legacy times() approach, it actually provides useful information. If this
bug is to be closed again, the closure should be accompanied by a citation
explaining why CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID is not a conforming implementation of
clock().
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.