This is the mail archive of the glibc-bugs@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug libc/12515] clock() should provide better precision


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12515

Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
   Last reconfirmed|2011-02-24 12:58:42         |2013-04-19
                 CC|                            |bugdal at aerifal dot cx
         Resolution|INVALID                     |
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #7 from Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> 2013-04-19 02:58:20 UTC ---
I think this bug should be revisited. As far as I can tell, the
CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID clock is a valid implementation of clock(), and unlike
the legacy times() approach, it actually provides useful information. If this
bug is to be closed again, the closure should be accompanied by a citation
explaining why CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID is not a conforming implementation of
clock().

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]