This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug math/3866] pow(double, double) does not fulfil several of C99's requirements
- From: "jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:00:42 +0000
- Subject: [Bug math/3866] pow(double, double) does not fulfil several of C99's requirements
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-3866-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3866
Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|aj at suse dot de |unassigned at sourceware
| |dot org
--- Comment #6 from Joseph Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-28 17:00:42 UTC ---
Confirmed still present on x86: (1), (2), (3), (4a), (4b), (5), (6), (7).
On x86_64: (1), (2) pass, (3) has the right result but no OVERFLOW exception,
(4a) has the right result but no UNDERFLOW exception, (4b) has the right result
but no DIVBYZERO exception, (5), (6), (7) pass.
There are two tests numbered (4) which I have marked (4a) and (4b). I do not
reproduce with current sources the report of (4b) pow(-0, -1e100) passing.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.