This is the mail archive of the glibc-bugs@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: There is no pow()

From: beradero <tessiof at yahoo dot com dot br>
To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:32:51 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: There is no pow()
References: <16128848.post@talk.nabble.com> <87zlsv7qox.fsf@suse.de> <16170020.post@talk.nabble.com> <877ifxc1wb.fsf@suse.de>

Uhmm.. I understand now.. I have to link to the libm (math). But, why stdio
don't need to be linked?

Thanks a lot man! I am new to GCC an GNU/Linux, and you help me a lot!


Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> 
> Andreas
> -- 
>  Andreas Jaeger, Director Platform / openSUSE, aj@suse.de
>   SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG NÃrnberg)
>    Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 NÃrnberg, Germany
>     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
> 
>  
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/There-is-no-pow%28%29-tp16128848p16265816.html
Sent from the Sourceware - glibc-bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

References:
- There is no pow()
  - From: beradero
- Re: There is no pow()
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: There is no pow()
  - From: beradero
- Re: There is no pow()
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]