This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug localedata/1015] There is a need for an alternative belarusian locale
- From: "yury_tarasievich at yahoo dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sources dot redhat dot com>
- To: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 4 Aug 2005 09:35:25 -0000
- Subject: [Bug localedata/1015] There is a need for an alternative belarusian locale
- References: <20050616151127.1015.mikhailian@altern.org>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sources dot redhat dot com
------- Additional Comments From yury_tarasievich at yahoo dot com 2005-08-04 09:35 -------
I didn't make myself clear, then. This isn't about linguistics at all.
In Belarusian language community, there exists certain interest group, promoting use of several (long obsoleted)
orthography rules. This group calls their variant of Belarusian orthography "classic".
Alexander Mikhailian proposes creating additional be_BY@... branch, which would assert usage of the mentioned
orthography variant. And that's perfectly okay! Just the qualifier isn't chosen well.
I wouldn't put "classic" but rather, e.g., "alternative" there because:
The term "classic", by every definition, is something well-recognized, widely or traditionally used.
However, virtually nobody in Belarusian community outside of the interest group (which isn't numerous and/or
popular!) recognizes the mentioned variant as "classic", neither by knowing or referring the name, nor by usage
tradition -- as the variant's key orthography features were obsoleted about 70 years ago!
Even the group-promoted usage of name "classic" started, it seems, between 1992 and 1994 (judging by two big
publications on Belarusian orthography by one of the group leaders).
On the other hand, term "alternative" here would be immediately recognizable, both by popular understanding and
by group self-imaging.
P.S. The book Kirill A. Shutemov pointed me to contains one of the editions of the mentioned orthography variant,
published by the interest group, supervised, even authored, it seems, by one of the interest group leaders.
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1015
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.