This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gdb 8.x - g++ 7.x compatibility


On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 23:54 -0500, Simon Marchi wrote:
> Your problem is probably linked to these issues, if you want to follow 
> them:
> 
> gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81932
> gdb: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22013
> 
> As Carl said, it's a good idea to try with the latest version of both 
> tools, but I think the issue will still be present.
> 
> GCC changed how it outputs unsigned template parameters in the debug 
> info (from 2u to just 2), and it doesn't look like it's going to change 
> it back.  So I suppose we'll have to find a way to make GDB deal with 
> it.

I also tried a couple of times [1][2][3] to get a discussion started on
the mailing lists for how to resolve this but didn't get any replies,
and I got busy with other things.

We really need to find someone who is knowlegeable on type lookup in
GDB.  That person needs to engage with the experts on the GCC side and
hash out the right answer to this problem.  In my experience, Jonathan
Wakely on the GCC side is extremely responsive, I'm just too much of a
tyro to be able to discuss it with him at the level needed to find a
solution.

I think it's an extremely serious issue, if GDB can't resolve some very
common (IME) types, but so far it hasn't risen to the level of getting
attention from those who have sufficient expertise to solve it.


[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2017-08/msg00120.html
[2] https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2017-08/msg00069.html
[3] https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2017-09/msg00042.html


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]