This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: sim vs c99

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:02:13 -0500
Subject: Re: sim vs c99
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <201502191406 dot t1JE6k4X000856 at greed dot delorie dot com>

On 19 Feb 2015 09:06, DJ Delorie wrote:
> clang defaults to c99 and gcc is moving towards it.
> 
> The simulator won't build with -std=c99, lots of these due to "extern
> inline" using the c89 semantics:
> 
> libsim.a(sim-core.o): In function `sim_addr_range_hit_p':
> binutils-gdb/sim/msp430/../common/sim-arange.c:290: multiple definition of `sim_addr_range_hit_p'
> nrun.o:binutils-gdb/sim/msp430/../common/sim-arange.c:290: first defined here
> 
> Are there any plans to switch to C99 or at least detect/support a C99
> environment?

i'm not actively looking into it (and probably won't until gcc blows up), but i 
have no problem if someone else wants to do so ahead of time.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

References:
- sim vs c99
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]