This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: why is sim_addr_range_hit_p tagged inline?

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 02:31:54 -0500
Subject: Re: why is sim_addr_range_hit_p tagged inline?
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <201411132030 dot sADKUbhj008048 at greed dot delorie dot com> <87r3x6nknn dot fsf at igel dot home> <201411142016 dot sAEKG0c0022671 at greed dot delorie dot com>

On 14 Nov 2014 15:16, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Unless HAVE_INLINE is defined.
> 
> Ah, ick.  I noticed this because I had a report from a Mac user that
> they were getting "multiply defined symbols" for that function.

the sim code base heavily inlines things for the sake of speed.  but i'm not 
sure what kind of perf difference it makes nowadays on modern systems.  would be 
worth seeing if we could just drop it all ...
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

References:
- why is sim_addr_range_hit_p tagged inline?
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: why is sim_addr_range_hit_p tagged inline?
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: why is sim_addr_range_hit_p tagged inline?
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]