This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Cleaning out obsolete bugs in bugzilla
- From: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb <gdb at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:42:38 -0700
- Subject: Re: Cleaning out obsolete bugs in bugzilla
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CADPb22ROq5ieBxJKFpBxOFYx_wSn-FT4A6j5HG1XTVp-O3_n0w at mail dot gmail dot com> <CADPb22RnA0aDsndyyoQu0gJ8spcWf1wr5taeqebFhUJK1ZLr0g at mail dot gmail dot com> <53209273 dot 9090407 at redhat dot com> <CADPb22Ra_37oHUWfx51pPuScSt3bv5+wjLDejS_zxpsER+Waaw at mail dot gmail dot com> <5320982C dot 2060308 at redhat dot com>
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 03/12/2014 05:10 PM, Doug Evans wrote:
>
>> "WONTFIX" could come across with an unintended connotation alright,
>> but I have no current data to assign a probability to it happening.
>> At the moment it's just gut feeling, which is why I think there's
>> benefit to something else that doesn't require much, if any,
>> discussion, like OBSOLETE.
>
> I think OBSOLETE is a good idea.
>
>> But I don't have a strong opinion on the
>> ultimate choice. If people have a strong opinion on not inventing
>> anything new, fine by me, let's go with WONTFIX until we have real
>> data that it can be a problem.
Cool, thanks.
OBSOLETE has been added (by overseers) and I've updated the wiki.
https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/DeveloperTips#Closing_obsolete_bugs