This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: GDB 6.8.92 available for testing


On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:23:31 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> I think that would be a bad idea since size_t will be a 64-bit type on
> 64-bit hosts.  This will increase memory usage on 6-bit hosts.

We do need 64-bit target TYPE_LENGTH support.  There exist >2GB debuginfos:
	http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc/rpms/gdb/devel/gdb-6.3-bz231832-obstack-2gb.patch?view=co

and I guess some HPC (High Performance Computing) is already exceeding it for
runtime data object size.  With dynamic data type sizes
(archer-jankratochvil-vla) such current dynamic size is stored in TYPE_LENGTH.


Just it should not be size_t but target_size_t.  Yes, it should be CORE_ADDR.


Regards,
Jan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]