This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: i386 int3 handling, running vs stepping

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
Cc: gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:08:08 -0500
Subject: Re: i386 int3 handling, running vs stepping
References: <20090201231819.A9FB61C7A19@localhost> <20090201233251.GA27142@caradoc.them.org> <e394668d0902011538r418676abif20e7413c70db84e@mail.gmail.com> <20090202042459.GA10080@caradoc.them.org> <e394668d0902021203u47b5a22fg9be1b3e987551154@mail.gmail.com> <20090202214915.GA4257@caradoc.them.org> <e394668d0902021726r66c6fc1cxf662d2a600e2e6b5@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 05:26:29PM -0800, Doug Evans wrote:
> For reference sake, while looking into something else I was reminded
> that the x86 linux port already looks at the insn being stepped.  Heh.
>  :-)

Oh, yeah.  That's a shame :-(  IIRC this works without the fudging on
some kernels.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- i386 int3 handling, running vs stepping
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: i386 int3 handling, running vs stepping
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: i386 int3 handling, running vs stepping
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: i386 int3 handling, running vs stepping
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: i386 int3 handling, running vs stepping
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: i386 int3 handling, running vs stepping
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: i386 int3 handling, running vs stepping
  - From: Doug Evans

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]