This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: i386 int3 handling, running vs stepping

From: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>
To: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 01:08:12 -0500
Subject: Re: i386 int3 handling, running vs stepping
References: <20090201231819.A9FB61C7A19@localhost> <20090201233251.GA27142@caradoc.them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

I can't see a plausible way around this, can you?  The SIGTRAP is
identical to the one for PTRACE_SINGLESTEP - unless the kernel
annotates the siginfo differently?


same trap, but surely gdb has enough info to figure out the
difference?

References:
- i386 int3 handling, running vs stepping
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: i386 int3 handling, running vs stepping
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]