This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: mi/2549: data-list-register-values igonores the format parameter


Tom Tromey writes:
 > >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
 > 
 > Tom> I am sending it through regression testing.
 > 
 > FYI, it passed there.  Not super surprising, but still good to know.

I agree.  It's not that surprising as your change is in get_registers which
only gets called by mi_cmd_data_list_register_values and, as I said earlier,
there are currently no tests for -data-list-register-values except on sparc.

Why not add the tests below?  There were three failures before your change and
they all pass after it.  They're pretty basic, and I don't know if there are
any architectures for which they wouldn't work, but they would at least prevent
this regression from occurring again.

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob


# Copyright 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.

# Test essential Machine interface (MI) operations
#
# Verify that, using the MI, we can run a simple program and look at registers.
#
# The goal is not to test gdb functionality, which is done by other tests,
# but to verify the correct output response to MI operations.
#


load_lib mi-support.exp
set MIFLAGS "-i=mi"

gdb_exit
if [mi_gdb_start] {
    continue
}

set testfile "basics"
set srcfile ${testfile}.c
set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
if  { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug additional_flags=-DFAKEARGV}] != "" } {
     untested mi-regs.exp
     return -1
}

proc register_tests_no_exec { } {
	# Test the generic IDT chip.
	mi_gdb_test "111-data-list-register-values" \
		".*111\\^error,msg=\"mi_cmd_data_list_register_values: Usage: -data-list-register-values <format> \\\[<regnum1>...<regnumN>\\\]\"" \
		"wrong arguments"

	mi_gdb_test "111-data-list-register-values x" \
		".*111\\^error,msg=\"No registers\.\"" \
		"no executable"
}

proc register_tests { } {
    global hex
    global decimal
    set octal "\[0-7\]+"
    set binary "\[0-1\]+"
    set float "\\-?((\[0-9\]+(\\.\[0-9\]+)?(e\[-+\]\[0-9\]+)?)|(nan\\($hex\\)))"

    mi_gdb_test "222-data-list-register-values x" \
	    "222\\^done,register-values=\\\[\{number=\"0\",value=\"$hex\"\}.*\\\]" \
	    "register values x"

    mi_gdb_test "333-data-list-register-values f" \
	    "333\\^done,register-values=\\\[\{number=\"0\",value=\"$float\"\}.*\\\]" \
	    "register values f"

    mi_gdb_test "444-data-list-register-values d" \
	    "444\\^done,register-values=\\\[\{number=\"0\",value=\"-?$decimal\"\}.*\\\]" \
	    "register values d"

    mi_gdb_test "555-data-list-register-values o" \
	    "555\\^done,register-values=\\\[\{number=\"0\",value=\"$octal\"\}.*\\\]" \
	    "register values o"

    mi_gdb_test "666-data-list-register-values t" \
	    "666\\^done,register-values=\\\[\{number=\"0\",value=\"$binary\"\}.*\\\]" \
	    "register values t"
}

register_tests_no_exec
mi_run_to_main
register_tests

mi_gdb_exit
return 0


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]