This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Move GDB to C++ ?

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:23:34 +0200
Subject: Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
References: <487658F7.1090508@earthlink.net> <200807101901.m6AJ1UMQ007185@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <48766A88.1050402@earthlink.net> <200807102153.m6ALrjjm017722@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20080711062612.GB6132@adacore.com> <g5774i$59h$1@ger.gmane.org>

Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com> writes:

> The inline functions are not specific to C++, and templates -- well, there
> are no issues debugging templates, and who needs templates outside of 
> (well-debugged already) STL, anyway (*)?
>
> Last time I checked, GDB had some bizarre logic to handle C++ namespaces,
> but well, who needs namespaces (*)?

FWIW, if you look at gold, it uses templates and namespaces quite
extensively. :-)

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Vladimir Prus

References:
- Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Stan Shebs
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Stan Shebs
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Vladimir Prus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]