This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Automatic dependency tracking
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
- Cc: drow at false dot org, gdb at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:30:46 -0600
- Subject: Re: Automatic dependency tracking
- References: <200806152203.14626.pedro@codesourcery.com> <u3anel69s.fsf@gnu.org> <20080616012617.GA8944@caradoc.them.org> <g35201$2uf$2@ger.gmane.org> <m33an413yx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20080625182858.GA25575@caradoc.them.org> <200806281920.m5SJKAQI008684@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
- Reply-to: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl> writes:
Mark> I'd like to avoid this if we can. On OpenBSD we include GDB in the
Mark> base system, but we don't have GNU make. This'll mean I'll have to do
Mark> extensive makefile hackary whenever I import a new version of GDB in
Mark> the OpenBSD tree. I'd rather spend that time on hacking more useful
Mark> stuff.
How does OpenBSD handle this for GCC?
Or does the OpenBSD gcc maintainer also rewrite the Makefiles?
Ugh.
FWIW, rewriting the patch I sent to avoid GNU make is likely to be
pretty fiddly & painful.
Tom