This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [GDB/MI] missing token in "stopped" output after -exec-run?

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 20:21:25 +0300
Subject: Re: [GDB/MI] missing token in "stopped" output after -exec-run?
References: <20080521035924.GA4148@adacore.com> <g10agt$3e9$1@ger.gmane.org> <20080521123607.GA11302@caradoc.them.org> <g116an$shu$1@ger.gmane.org>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> From:  Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> Date:  Wed, 21 May 2008 16:59:05 +0400
> 
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 09:04:28AM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> >> Yes (and I've explicitly posted to the list about this change, quite some time before
> >> actually changing things).
> > 
> > Do you think we should list MI changes like this in NEWS, for any
> > frontend author who doesn't read the list?
> 
> We probably should. I'll review recent MI changes for NEWS-worthness.

Yes, please.

References:
- [GDB/MI] missing token in "stopped" output after -exec-run?
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [GDB/MI] missing token in "stopped" output after -exec-run?
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- Re: [GDB/MI] missing token in "stopped" output after -exec-run?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [GDB/MI] missing token in "stopped" output after -exec-run?
  - From: Vladimir Prus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]