Re: Small remote file transfer protocol adition

[Pedro Alves <pedro_alves at portugalmail dot pt>]

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:51:58PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > Well, since you ask :-)  I'd prefer my first suggestion, just
> > because it's simpler.  No worries about buffer size
> > limits, and the message being truncated.  If passing a message,
> > I'd have to be careful with what I'd say there, so it
> > doesn't confuse the user (strerror says one thing, native
> > error says something similar but not the same, possibly in
> > different locales).  This probably means I'd just pass the error
> > number anyway.
>
> Yes, I see.  I'm convinced.

Proposed patch posted here:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-01/msg00860.html

--
Pedro Alves