This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Support for PPC405 / PPC440 registers
- From: Ignaz Forster <ignaz dot forster at gmx dot de>
- To: gdb at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:28:09 +0200
- Subject: Support for PPC405 / PPC440 registers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I recently tried to debug an embedded IBM PowerPC 405 and 440 over JTAG.
The necessary GDB stub was written by myself (unfortunately using
confidential information, so I won't be able to publish it).
When trying to display the contents of the processor's registers I
noticed only the PPC403 register layout was included in the standard GDB
distribution. As the registers of the different processors in the
4xx-series differ, I tried to modify GDB and BFD to handle the registers
of the additional processors. The following files were changed:
- - bfd/cpu-powerpc: Added definitions for the additional processors in
the struct 'bfd_powerpc_archs'
- - bfd/archures.c: Added processors in 'bfd_architecture'
- - gdb/ppc-tdep.h: Added SPR numbers for new registers
- - gdb/rs6000-tdep.c: Added processors to the struct 'variants' and
created appropriate 'static const struct reg registers_...' entries with
the available registers
After that the registers showed up and could be used after setting the
new processors with "set architecture".
Question 1: What did I destroy by doing this?
Question 2: Would a patch to add support for these processors be useful?
What else should be done before even thinking about doing so?
Thanks,
- --
Ignaz Forster <ignaz.forster@gmx.de>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGCCzZ/2+SjQTlQJkRArxWAJ4qrRKwQkaD/0qIuPMaYrAT4TxjSwCgkt7i
W99pT7iGjJ49m3BUO76LeRk=
=xvW9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----