Re: [SPAM] Re: gdbserver-6.6 threading support

[Jon Ringle <jon at ringle dot org>]

Jon Ringle wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:22:29PM -0500, Jon Ringle wrote:
> >  
> > > Sending packet: $qOffsets#4b...Ack
> > > Packet received: E01
> > > warning: Remote failure reply: E01
> > >     
> >
> > #if defined(__UCLIBC__) && !defined(__UCLIBC_HAS_MMU__)
> >
> > Is this really Linux, or uClinux?  It seems to be configured as if it
> > were uClinux, but it looks like Linux.
> >
> >   
> The target is Linux-2.6.16.29. Processor is IXP455 (it has an MMU). 
> The rootfs was built with buildroot using uClibc-0.9.28. Perhaps, I've 
> got something misconfigured in buildroot or uClibc then...
I just checked my uClibc-0.9.28 source tree and I can't find any 
reference to __UCLIBC_HAS_MMU__. So, __UCLIBC_HAS_MMU__ will not be 
defined for anyone that uses uClibc-0.9.28. Where does 
__UCLIBC_HAS_MMU__ come from?

ringlej@crossdev:~/src/uClibc-0.9.28$ grep -r __UCLIBC_HAS_MMU__ .
ringlej@crossdev:~/src/uClibc-0.9.28$ grep -r __UCLIBC__ .
./libc/stdio/vfprintf.c:#if defined(__UCLIBC__) && 
!defined(__UCLIBC_HAS_FLOATS__)
./libc/stdio/_stdio.c:#ifndef __UCLIBC__
./libc/stdio/_stdio.c:#endif /* __UCLIBC__ */
./libc/sysdeps/linux/common/ssp.c:#ifdef __UCLIBC__
./test/dlopen/test1.c:#ifdef __UCLIBC__
./test/dlopen/test2.c:#ifdef __UCLIBC__
./test/dlopen/dltest.c:#ifdef __UCLIBC__
./extra/locale/tst_nl_langinfo.c:#if !defined(__UCLIBC__) && 0
./README:           #ifdef __UCLIBC__
./include/features.h:#define    __UCLIBC__              1