This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 03:01:01PM -0500, jbbachky@aim.com wrote:$QPassSignals:e;10;11;13;14;17;18;1a;1b;1c;1e;1f;20;21;24;25;4c;#af...Ack
>On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 01:46:56PM -0500, jbbachky@aim.com wrote: >>Sending packet: >>
added
>
>Ignore signal 0xe. In the GDB remote protocol that is SIGALRM.
>
I had "handle SIGALRM nostop noprint" in my .gdbinit file I had
________________________________________________________________________that while digging into this problem a while ago and had forgotten about it. Removing it and re-running everything doesn't appear to have an effect. In
That's the default, so it should make no difference.
This is the CVS version from Wednesday evening, with your patch contained here: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2006-11/msg00114.html
That should be fine. But update to today's CVS with no extra patches just to be sure.
If it's still doing this, then I would recommend a debugging printf in linux-low.c, right before the new if statement with the pass_signals[] check. pass_signals[target_signal_from_host (WSTOPSIG (wstat))] ought to be set for SIGALRM, and we ought not to return it to GDB, but your log says we did that.
-- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |