This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Return to Reverse Execution

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Paul Koning <pkoning at equallogic dot com>, msnyder at redhat dot com, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com, jrydberg at virtutech dot com, fche at redhat dot com, brolley at redhat dot com, ebachalo at redhat dot com
Cc: pkoning at equallogic dot com
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:39:43 +0200
Subject: Re: Return to Reverse Execution
References: <43BC376F.4000307@redhat.com> <u8xtvjmfb.fsf@gnu.org> <43BDF1D6.1040807@redhat.com> <ufyo1ivax.fsf@gnu.org> <17342.35464.445000.474814@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20060113160223.GC6770@brasko.net>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:02:23 -0500
> From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
> Cc: eliz@gnu.org, msnyder@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com,
> 	jrydberg@virtutech.com, fche@redhat.com, brolley@redhat.com,
> 	ebachalo@redhat.com
> 
> > I'll add my voice to Eli.  "Back" is a direction; "reverse" is (in one
> > of its meanings) a change of direction.
> 
> Has anyone even considered "Previous", instead of "Back" or "Reverse"?
> I mean, Previous/Next go together IMO, just as Backward/Forward go together.

For "next", "previous" is indeed a good counterpart.  But we were
mainly talking about the other commands: step, continue, finish,
until, etc.

References:
- Return to Reverse Execution
  - From: Michael Snyder
- Re: Return to Reverse Execution
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: Return to Reverse Execution
  - From: Michael Snyder
- Re: Return to Reverse Execution
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: Return to Reverse Execution
  - From: Paul Koning
- Re: Return to Reverse Execution
  - From: Bob Rossi

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]