This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Stepping over longjmp presumably broken for glibc

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
Cc: jimb at red-bean dot com, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 16:28:51 -0500
Subject: Re: Stepping over longjmp presumably broken for glibc
References: <ur7808mft.fsf@gnu.org> <8f2776cb0512262024n39deb5e9q64ab62c48652e336@mail.gmail.com> <20051230023830.GA26004@nevyn.them.org> <200512300932.jBU9WBn6015669@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20051230162507.GA5006@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0601012125y346a1807w7dc5e5997741b4c4@mail.gmail.com> <20060106194347.GA18951@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0601061228h50b3feaft6bf98145ef649bac@mail.gmail.com> <20060106203642.GA20698@nevyn.them.org> <200601062126.k06LQT8Y012488@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>

On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:26:29PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> But we can check whether it returns to setjmp or not.

How?  It won't return to "setjmp", but to setjmp's call site.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- Re: Stepping over longjmp presumably broken for glibc
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: Stepping over longjmp presumably broken for glibc
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Stepping over longjmp presumably broken for glibc
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: Stepping over longjmp presumably broken for glibc
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Stepping over longjmp presumably broken for glibc
  - From: Mark Kettenis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]