This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Maintainer policy for GDB
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:23:09PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:21:30PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 09:39:33PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>>Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to work. For example, the message I'm
>>>replying to came without the X-IsSubscribed header, although I'm quite
>>>sure you are a subscriber. I did see that header on a message I sent
>>>myself; is it possible that you only arranged for this header on the
>>>message reflected back to the sender?
>>
>>That's what I meant by saying that this method not foolproof. My sender
>>address does not match my subscription address.
>>
>>Again, this is not a foolproof way of figuring out if someone is not
>>subscribed but it should be a foolproof way of figuring out if someone
>>is subscribed, i.e., if you see the header then the sender is definitely
>>subscribed. If you don't see the header then the person may or may not
>>be subscribed, depending on how they sent the software.
>>
>>That said, however, I just modified the software to check the header from
>>as well as the envelope sender. Maybe this email will show up with the
>>X-IsSubscribed header set.
>
>Nope. Oh well.
That's better.
cgf