This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: New target support for GDB
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Steve Underwood <steveu at coppice dot org>
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:16:06 -0400
- Subject: Re: New target support for GDB
- References: <430C9B45.6030101@coppice.org>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 12:07:33AM +0800, Steve Underwood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Support for the Texas Instruments MSP430 made its way into the main
> binutils CVS some time ago. I kept letting the GDB support slip behind
> the current changes, but now I am making a push to bring it up to date,
> and get it into the main CVS. I have code that seems to work with this
> week's GDB snaphot (6.3.50.20050822), though it needs more testing and
> polishing before it is merged. I want to sort out the procedural stuff
> in parallel with completing the code.
>
> I understand I need to complete an FSF form, to contribute the code. I'm
> not sure which form, or where I need to send it. I looked on the GNU
> site, but there are a number of procedures for different circumstances.
> I'd like to clarify the appropriate one. I don't know the procedure for
> delivering the code, cleaning up anything which it not considered
> appropriate, etc. Also, I don't know who the coordinator is, who would
> deal with this.
>
> Can someone help me?
I'll take care of this off-list.
> We still need to get support into the main GCC repository. Once the GDB
> stuff is in place, I will try to push the compiler stuff forward. We've
> had solid support for GCC 3.2.3 since that was a new version. Again, we
> haven't made the necessary push to catch up with changes to the compiler
> core, and get our stuff merged. Now seems like a good time.
FWIW, I would recommend getting the compiler port contributed before
the GDB port, so that the GDB port can be properly tested...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC