This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: problem debugging assembler functions
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Vladimir Prus <ghost at cs dot msu dot su>
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:45:48 -0400
- Subject: Re: problem debugging assembler functions
- References: <d8m7a8$akn$1@sea.gmane.org> <200506141919.22749.ghost@cs.msu.su> <20050614152726.GA5039@nevyn.them.org> <200507141254.42149.ghost@cs.msu.su>
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:54:41PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 June 2005 19:27, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> > > So, moving 'find_pc_line' above will reasult in extra lookup only if
> > > - the command is stepi/nexti, or
> > > - the first condition evaluates to true (which means we've entered
> > > undebuggable code)
> > >
> > > I have no idea is that's bad or not performance-wise, just clarifying
> > > what's going on.
> >
> > Hmm, that's encouraging! This might be a good improvement, then.
>
> So, is this change going in?
>
> I attach the patch I'm using locally for your reference.
Generally nothing goes in without a patch being submitted (with
changelog, to gdb-patches). It sounds like you're doing a lot of work
on GDB; have you considered getting a copyright assignment on file?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC