This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: single-stepping remote target fails

On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 04:37:32PM -0400, Chad Phillips wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:06:42PM -0400, Chad Phillips wrote:
> >>Sending packet: $s#73...Ack
> >>Packet received: S00
> >>Sending packet: $p40#d4...Ack
> >>Packet received: 0000438E
> >>
> >>Program received signal 0, Signal 0.
> >
> >You should be returning S05, SIGTRAP.
> >
> 
> Fantastic!  That solved my problem.  Now, gdb continues to step to the 
> next source instruction.  Thanks!
> 
> BTW, the documentation for the remote protocol simply says that the 
> signal number is 'poorly defined', and in general to use UNIX 
> conventions.  I made the incorrect assumption that the signal number is 
> irrelevant.  Are there other signal numbers that have significance to GDB?

I think, only cosmetically.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]