This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Orphans to adopt?
- From: Manoj Iyer <manjo at austin dot ibm dot com>
- To: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
- Cc: cagney at gnu dot org, gdb at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:48:24 -0500 (CDT)
- Subject: Re: Orphans to adopt?
- References: <428A3FB7.8070008@apple.com> <200505172035.j4HKZ0oa028608@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl><Pine.LNX.4.58.0505171549450.3652@lazy> <200505172121.j4HLLjsi002393@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl><428CCFB5.5010308@gnu.org> <200506102136.j5ALaWXe018181@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
> What would be immediatly helpful is for more people to expose GDB to GCC
> 4 so that all the other problems above and beyond gdb_byte can be
> identified and fixed.
>
> Yup, but GCC got a bit bloated and takes a long time too compile on my
> poor old boxes.
>
Yep, I am working on that in my spare time. We have internal daily builds
of GCC 4.0 which I am using to build and test GDB. I have one patch
outstanding that need to be approved for commit, its a patch for GDBserver
(there is a missing header file and wrong types). Can anyone look into
that please? SUB: " [RFC] GDBserver compiler warnings patch" gdbpatches@
pinged on June 6th 05.
What I can also do is, once a week/while post test results for
gdb+gcc4.0 to gdb-testers@. Is this useful?
Thanks
Manjo