This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: implementing stepi


On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 08:49:28AM -0400, Decker, Paul wrote:
> 
> 
> hello everyone,
> 
> I have what I believe is a simple question on the implementation of the
> stepi feature.  Some processors provide a mechanism to step exactly one
> instruction, such as a special bit in a debug control register.  While
> other processors don't provide this capability, and to implement a step,
> breakpoints must be sprinkled in various places, and a run (to the
> breakpoint) performed.   Looking at some of the gdb source, it seems
> that stepi is implemented using the breakpoint method.  In doing a port
> to my custom processor, is it considered ok to use the hardware method
> if available?

No, stepi is implemented in both ways depending on the features of the
target processor.  This is why target_resume takes a "step" argument.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]