Re: patch review time

[Bob Rossi <bob at brasko dot net>]

On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 11:12:52AM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote:
> Bob Rossi wrote:
> >On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 09:32:40AM +1300, Nick Roberts wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> >I'm going to contribute a large amount to GDB/MI and get it done within a 
> >reasonable amount of time, or I'm not going to be able to. The point of
> >this Email thread is to bring up the fact that I simply can not wait
> >months and months to get what I need to get done, done.
> >
> >Bob Rossi
> >
> 
> Maybe you could check out your own copy of the cvs, add all the stuff to it,
> test it, then get it included in the real cvs some months later?

Yeah, this would make sense. However, when I post large patches, they
are *completely* ignored. 

Also, to be completely honest, that would probably cripple the quality of
my patches. When my patches are reviewed, and people chime in, the
quality and end result of my work is significantly greater.

The real behind the scene point is that Andrew has a foot hold on GDB,
and for some reason, no one else in this community bothers to stand up
for what should be right. 
   
Significant contributions to GDB should be able to be done within a 
reasonable amount of time!

Thanks,
Bob Rossi